From:	James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: [Q]Computing speed in C++
Date:	Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:54:24 +0000
Organization:	None unless you want to pay me
Message-ID:	<HsXv8FAwJp$0Ewie@ghoti.demon.co.uk>
References:	<34FCB769 DOT 42BEF1A8 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
	<34FD3174 DOT 2401F904 AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> <NhY3fDAorU$0Ewz4 AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
	<34FD593A DOT DF2207FA AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
Reply-To:	ghoti AT nospam DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ghoti.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	12
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <34FD593A DOT DF2207FA AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>, Bum-Seok Hyun
<dominic AT gong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr> writes
>> That said the C++ is still slower 22s (25s using your code) compared to
>> 16s (on my system).
>
>Excuse me, sir.Exactly what did mean using my code and yours?
>

my version was to compile the c as c++, instead of using your c++
version.
-- 
James Undery <james AT ghoti DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>

- Raw text -