Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 1998 22:27:46 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
From:	Hasdi R Hashim <hasdi AT umich DOT edu>
To:	Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC, MMX PATCH (YES!)
In-Reply-To:	<199803040137.RAA07807@adit.ap.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980303221113.13982E-100000@misg.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> At 01:08  3/3/1998 GMT, Hasdi Rodzmann Hashim wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> >	I am reposting this again (musta misposted). Basically, I have a
> >BETA version of MMX patch for GCC 2.7.2.x. You can check it out from my
> >homepage: 
> 
> Just wondering: Does this relate to PGCC in any way? Should it?

PGCC is based on EGCS. Yes, I already contacted PGCC coordinator, Marc
Lehman and he is quite interested (been working out with him for weeks
already). Right now, I am trying to convince some guys at egcs AT cygnus DOT com.
I started this patch on 2.7.2.1 source tree and will continue working on
it for practical reasons. The Machine Description for 2.7.2.1 is so
different than 2.8.x and EGCS so I have to tear myself into three
different directions to support them all. Also, 2.7.2.1 is the more widely
used non-beta version and the patch only requires minor changes to the
source tree (for other MMX-like architectures: VIS/ultrasparc,
MAX/parisc2.0, and MAX/axp, no patch is needed) 

It is posibble on 2.8.x/EGCS (simple changes really) but for 2.8.x I need
to talk to Richard Kenner about this (GCC maintainer 2.8.x). If you wanna
help out on 2.8.x let me know.

Later

Hasdi

- Raw text -