From:	"Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: <string.h>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:33:16 -0800
Organization:	Hewlett Packard
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<6bvf9e$65f$1@rosenews.rose.hp.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19980211115618 DOT 007ecc60 AT mail DOT kudos DOT net> <34E22910 DOT F245ED05 AT cornell DOT edu> <34E2DB56 DOT 5515BABD AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De> <34E2F36B DOT 37071F81 AT cornell DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ros51675cra.rose.hp.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

A. Sinan Unur wrote in message <34E2F36B DOT 37071F81 AT cornell DOT edu>...
> AFAIK
>_string.h (i.e. String.h) is for the GNU String class, as opposed to
>string which is supposed to be the C++ standard header.
I don't know the exact differences between the two header files, but you do
not get a string
class from <string>.  It is only defined in <_string.h> (String.h).  If you
use <string> the program still won't compile.  At least in my setup, which
is probably the worst one to base things off of :)

- Raw text -