From:	"Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Any luck builing libg++-2.8.0 or libstdg++-2.8.0 ??
Date:	Mon, 2 Feb 1998 10:44:16 -0800
Organization:	Hewlett Packard
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<6b545s$ms$1@rosenews.rose.hp.com>
References:	<34D0B775 DOT 15F21D45 AT no DOT spam DOT mcs DOT nl> <6auba2$o2k AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ros51675cra.rose.hp.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Paul Derbyshire wrote in message <6auba2$o2k AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>...
>There's a real (not alpha, not beta) stable PGCC out?
Well, I might still consider it a beta, but there is a PGCC 1.0.1 'official'
release out for both C and C++.
There was also an official PGCC 1.0 release (for C only, no C++).

> Why the hell wasn't this announced?
The printer lost the promotional flyers ;)   Actually, I did send mail to
djgpp list.  I don't annouce them on
djgpp-anounce, since they are not real dj release.  Perhaps I should tho...

- Raw text -