Message-Id:	<199801242041.JAA07453@cirrostratus.netaccess.co.nz>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <chapmic5 AT pop3 DOT netaccess DOT co DOT nz>
From:	"Richard Chappell" <chapmic5 AT cirrostratus DOT netaccess DOT co DOT nz>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 1998 08:33:40 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Is RHIDE a good environment to use?
Reply-to:	Pixnaps AT netaccess DOT co DOT nz
In-reply-to:	<34C695AF.64E3@cs.com>

> I have been following the posts of this group on and off for about 
> year
> now.  I know that there has been some debate as to which 
> environment users
> of djgpp should use: RHIDE or EMACS?
> 
> Which do you prefer?  and why?

I've never used EMACS, so I don't know what it's like, but I use 
RHIDE, and it works perfectly well for me! EMACS (from what I've 
heard) has more fancy stuff, but I think it takes up a lot more HDD 
space than RHIDE does.

- Raw text -