From:	Fabrice ILPONSE <fabrice AT trash DOT lip6 DOT fr>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Inline asm
Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 1997 13:51:07 +0100
Organization:	Universites Paris VI/Paris VII - France
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<3482B2BB.A3@trash.lip6.fr>
References:	<347A974A DOT 91C9FBC5 AT mail DOT htk DOT fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	asim.lip6.fr
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Henri Ossi wrote:
> 
> A quick question.
> Do I have to push and pop all the registers, which I use in inline asm?

	You MUST !!

> What about return values?
> Can I leave a number in ax to tell the calling function, if there was
> any errors (etc)?
> Or do I have to use a variable to store the number and then use
> "return"?

	I do it that way.

> 
> Thanks.

-- 
	^ ^ ^
	| | |
	+-+-+	Fabrice ILPONSE
	  |	<fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr>
	  |
	  |
	  -
I can think of is that the 386
misses an IRQ int now and then. Both machines are doing network and
flash-disk IO access. Can anyone tell me if this could be the cause, or
could it be something else? Would increasing the priority of IRQ 8 by
reprogramming the PIC be a solution? Should disk access-interrupts have
the highest priority?

Lots of questions, no answers. That's life :)

I will appreciate any comments or pointers to documentation!

Cheers!

        Rob Kramer
	rkramer AT xs4all DOT nl
	
P.S. Could you please CC your reply to my e-mail address? Thenks!

 linking tools
(i.e. not rebuilt wrongly); in this case, your programs should run as
reliably as the compiler itself.  Does the compiler work from your DOS
setup?

-- 
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk

- Raw text -