From:	Paul DOT Moore AT uk DOT origin-it DOT com (Paul Moore)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: STL & DJGPP
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:46:35 GMT
Organization:	Origin
Distribution:	world,inet
Message-ID:	<3454b62f.23385248@news.origin.nl>
References:	<344f2603 DOT 962825 AT news DOT polito DOT it> <62pbvm$993 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dhcppc-247-37.run.uk.origin-it.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
Lines:	25
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 24 Oct 1997 05:33:42 GMT, ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul
Derbyshire) wrote:

>
>Chtulhu (I DOT Vighetto AT avigliana DOT alpcom DOT it) writes:
>> I woul try STL programming.
>> Tthere's some problem with DJGPP?
>> Which (free) implementatio of STL works best with our compiler and
>> where is downloadable?
>
>Try the STL that comes with the C++ components of DJGPP. They should show
>up in %DJDIR%/lang/cxx. Just compile something like:
>
[...]

Is GCC (and hence DJGPP) likely to come back up to speed on the
standard C++ implementation anytime soon? It's quite a long way behind
the "current state of the art" if I recall correctly - no namespaces
yet, none of the newer template stuff, non-standard STL header names
(should be <string> not <string.h>), none of the allocator stuff, etc.

Of course, I could be wrong - but 2.7.2.1 has been around for quite a
time now, and the standard has changed a lot recently...

Paul Moore.

- Raw text -