From:	Genady Beryozkin <c0467082 AT techst02 DOT technion DOT ac DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 1997 22:19:13 +0200
Organization:	The Technion
Lines:	40
Message-ID:	<34452541.505CB073@t2.technion.ac.il>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971008133146 DOT 28780E-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	192.115.49.8
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> This still requires a translator to be driven by gcc.  And we know that
> such a critter doesn't exist.

The most rediculous thing about it is that when I debug my AT&T style
code with that FSDB debugger, I get it back in INTEL style !

I also agree that INTEL&TASM&MASM etc standard is a little more
wide-used than AT&T standard - so why do you bother to waste your time 
just for compatibility with SPARC & other ? Assembler is supposed to be 
machine-dependent.

Genady
--------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Genady Beryozkin
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"

begin:          vcard
fn:             Genady Beryozkin
n:              Beryozkin;Genady
org:            The Technion
adr:            ;;;Natzrat Illit / Haifa;;;Israel
email;internet: c0467082 AT t2 DOT technion DOT ac DOT il
note:           Homepage : http://t2.technion.ac.il/~c0467082/
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard


--------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427--

- Raw text -