From:	David Jenkins <me AT jenkinsdavid DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.graphics.algorithms
Subject:	Test Gone Bad.. Ideas?
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 05:25:26 +0100
Organization:	None
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<BL6ChaA2KaQ0EwJ0@jenkinsdavid.demon.co.uk>
References:	<343E42A9 DOT FDD57A58 AT sampo DOT creighton DOT edu> <3441794B DOT 41C6 AT turner DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	jenkinsdavid.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	38
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <3441794B DOT 41C6 AT turner DOT com>, Frederick Haab
<fred DOT haab AT turner DOT com> writes
>Thomas Charron wrote:
>
>> ... supposed to merely slowly rotate a box,
>> just so I could see it..    Only one problem, it's definitely NOT doing
>> THAT..  It seems to be moving at an angle, changing it's size, getting
>> thinner on the x, and longer on the Y..  Here's a copy of the source,
>> and I've attached the exe so you can see..  
>
>First of all, I'll also start by scolding you about posting a binary
>on a non-binary newsgroup.  But I won't go balistic about it either.
>
Why not??

Is it just me??

I've seen flames for people simply UUencoding a .c file let alone a
227kb binary file.

I think binary attachments are wrong, AFAIK they upset the following
groups,
1- DJ's mailing list, can it handle binary attachments??

2- People using other computer systems, Amiga, Mac etc,etc. The original
posting went to comp.graphics.algorithms too.

3- People who pay have to per minute/second for phone line connections.
(Like myself. :( )

4- People who have to pay per kb they download, are there any left?? :)

Am I wrong??

-- 
http://www.jenkinsdavid.demon.co.uk for C programmers.
David Jenkins

- Raw text -