From:	firewind <firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Borland/djgpp functions
Date:	12 Oct 1997 18:06:49 GMT
Organization:	Netcom
Lines:	32
Message-ID:	<61r3jp$dkh@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com>
References:	<34383EE9 DOT 42A83CA0 AT cornell DOT edu> <19971006232801 DOT TAA28733 AT ladder01 DOT news DOT aol DOT com> <3440AA6D DOT 26D5 AT sci DOT fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	elp-tx2-16.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Aatu Koskensilta <zaphod AT sci DOT fi> wrote:
> Most C code does (actually, there is very few C programs that won't compile
> as C++ program with no modifications at all), because C is a subset of C++.

<nitpick>
C++ is a superset of C.
</nitpick>

> However, your program uses none of the C++ specific features (such as the
> standard (perhaps some day?:)) io objects cout/cin etc.) and is thus a C
> program. In a sense it also is a C++ program.... I think it's more convinient
> to speak of C programs when none of the C++ specific features are used...

Because such programs are C programs... I think you can only call a program
C++ if it uses features specific to C++. Some things, too, can -only- be called
C programs and not C++ programs; to wit:

int main(void)
{
	return(6 / /* comment */ 3);
}

which will compile beautifully as C (well, gcc would require -ansi -pedantic)
but not as C++. I recall seeing more (and more real-world; how many people
actually stick a comment after the divide sign like that? :) examples of this
in comp.lang.c.

-- 
[- 				 firewind	                            -]
[-   email: firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org (home), firewind AT aurdev DOT com (work)  -]
[- 	    "You're just jealous because the voices talk to -me-."          -]
[-                   Have a good day, and enjoy your C.		            -]

- Raw text -