delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/10/05/16:05:20

Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 22:00:53 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Wojciech Piechowski <voyt AT delta DOT ds2 DOT pg DOT gda DOT pl>
To: Reinier Heeres <rwh AT worldonline DOT nl>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
In-Reply-To: <34361EA4.BFFADE9E@worldonline.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971005215652.23040A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0


On Sat, 4 Oct 1997, Reinier Heeres wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I would like to know if there are any other guys who'd like to see
> NORMAL 80x86 assembly inline in their programs? Why isn't it build in?
> Only because of the portability???
> 
> Reinier


You can use external assembler NASM (free), which uses intel syntax.
I don't remember where I get it from, but one of its authors is
anakin AT pobox DOT com


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019