From:	Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
Date:	Sat, 04 Oct 1997 09:08:56 -0400
Organization:	Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<34363FE8.5AD@cam.org>
References:	<34361EA4 DOT BFFADE9E AT worldonline DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynamicppp-181.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Reinier Heeres wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I would like to know if there are any other guys who'd like to see
> NORMAL 80x86 assembly inline in their programs? Why isn't it build in?
> Only because of the portability???
What do you mean by NORMAL assembly? Intel syntax? I don't consider that
*normal*, both syntaxes are normal. Then, what else?
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
Go ahead and build another Messiah
We dig another grave...

- Raw text -