From:	"Thomas Djafari" <frogger AT micronet DOT fr>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject:	Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:05:41 +0200
Organization:	NetSat Inc.
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<5vjc1o$pal$1@news.internetsat.com>
References:	<3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <5uuqci$15l AT sjx-ixn5 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <34131883 DOT 29A3 AT mho DOT net> <341714E9 DOT F6CC2E67 AT rpi DOT edu> <34184FB9 DOT 441D AT cam DOT org> <34185990 DOT 3DFA AT sensor DOT com> <34189915 DOT 79BB AT cam DOT org> <5vhpcs$sd$1 AT news DOT internetsat DOT com> <341cec0c DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33>
Reply-To:	"Thomas Djafari" <tdjafari AT nordnet DOT fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	gate4-195.nordnet.fr
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Herman Schoenfeld wrote in article <341cec0c DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33>...

>In article <5vhpcs$sd$1 AT news DOT internetsat DOT com>, frogger AT micronet DOT fr says...
>>
>>>so many "not so cheap PC based UNIXes" ?? I thought GCC was a standard
>>>in the unix world...
>>
>>GCC is a standard, this doesnb't mean it's a good compiler : it's one of
the
>>WORST !
>>
>>
>>
>oh, and how do you figure that?
>
>
it's very easy, take some code, compile it, disassemble it.
the latest gcc version I tried is the one that is given with Linux 2.0.0
slackware. the compiler produced (with optimisation !) the worst code I've
seen from a compiler these last years.
if you want I can publish here the output, the results are obvious with
absolutly no hesitation possible

- Raw text -