From:	"Chris Lomont" <clomont AT omni DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject:	Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:21:39 -0500
Organization:	Izi Wa Computer Misc
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<5v76id$rn3@mozo.cc.purdue.edu>
References:	<3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <3412DDA8 DOT C428AF45 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <341316EA DOT E14 AT mho DOT net> <34158665 DOT 8731090 AT news DOT concentric DOT net> <34148F08 DOT 7A16 AT pacbell DOT net> <5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	omni.cc.purdue.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

 db <*bowlin*@*uiuc.edu*> wrote in article
<5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>...
>1.)BC++ 5.02,Symantec C++ and Watcom C++ produce faster and smaller
>executables than MSVC++ 5.0.

Please post some  references for these claims. The results I've heard so far
put MSVC 5.0 exe's faster and smaller than each of those other compilers.

Chris Lomont

- Raw text -