From:	Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject:	Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 1997 21:21:25 -0400
Organization:	Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<34189915.79BB@cam.org>
References:	<3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <5uuqci$15l AT sjx-ixn5 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <34131883 DOT 29A3 AT mho DOT net> <341714E9 DOT F6CC2E67 AT rpi DOT edu> <34184FB9 DOT 441D AT cam DOT org> <34185990 DOT 3DFA AT sensor DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynamicppp-8.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Ron Natalie wrote:
> 
> Vic wrote:
> >
> > > Besides the Game Quake, professionals don't use free compileres --
> > this is a ridiculous statement. the majority of UNIXes is based on GCC,
> > right? so how can you say professionals don't use free compilers?
> 
> How can you say the majority of UNIXes are based on GCC.  Maybe the
> majority of cheap PC UNIX clones, but the rest usually use a better
> compiler than GCC.
like? please tell me...I'm really curious. The compiler makers I know
are Zortech, Borland, Microsoft ,FSF + maybe some others I don't know
about (maybe I'm just ignorant, right?) but FSF (GCC) is the only one I
know that makes a compiler for so many platforms (OH, OK, guys like IBM
might make compilers for their own workstations or systems too)
so please tell me, who is this company that makes a better compiler for
so many "not so cheap PC based UNIXes" ?? I thought GCC was a standard
in the unix world...
BTW what in the world do you mean by "cheap PC UNIX clone" ? do you mean
free-BSD or linux? they're good OSs, you know...and yes, gcc is a
standard on those...
(the others: sorry for the babbling, but it's late and I ate too many
Rum based cookies...:)
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
chief,don't turn on the turbine 'cause I'm insideeeeeeee....

- Raw text -