Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 1997 10:39:50 +0800 (GMT)
From:	Orlando Andico <orly AT dilnet DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph>
To:	Thomas Womack <mert0236 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<5uur1s$sdc$2@news.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SGI.3.93.970908103805.2452A-100000@gibson>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On 7 Sep 1997, Thomas Womack wrote:

..
> VC++ 4.2 has a strict superset of the features of DJGPP; if you want to give
> DJGPP a nine, you don't have much choice over giving VC++ a 10.

That is quite incorrect. As I pointed out in my earlier post, you choose
the tool to fit your needs. You don't compare apples and oranges. True,
they're both edible fruits. True, both DJGPP and VC++ are compilers. But I
wouldn't want to port my UNIX applications using VC++. And I don't think
I'd want to write Windows apps (if I ever do -- fat chance of that) with
DJGPP.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Orlando Alcantara Andico
WWW:   http://www2.mozcom.com/~orly/         Email: orly AT mozcom DOT com
ICBM:  14 30 00 N  120 59 00 E               POTS:  (+632) 932-2385

- Raw text -