delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
From: | Peter Berdeklis <peter AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca> |
Subject: | Re: complex numbers, correct ?? |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SGI.3.91.970902102630.29054B-100000@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca> |
Nntp-Posting-Host: | chinook.physics.utoronto.ca |
Sender: | news AT info DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca (System Administrator) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Organization: | University of Toronto - Dept. of Physics |
In-Reply-To: | <5u8stn$lk4$1@news.IAEhv.nl> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 1997 14:30:09 GMT |
References: | <5tsl8i$ce$1 AT news DOT IAEhv DOT nl> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970827160403 DOT 12574A-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca> <3406B175 DOT 35AB AT rug DOT ac DOT be> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970829111941 DOT 7949B-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca> <5u8stn$lk4$1 AT news DOT IAEhv DOT nl> |
Lines: | 18 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
On 30 Aug 1997, Jos Bergervoet wrote: > It is still not clear to me, whether the complex number syntax will change > in the near future. Is the gxx-compliant syntax final? Who can reasure me? The statement: cout << "Complex number A = " << A; where a is a complex type is correct according to the current draft C++ standard, so you may assume that the code will work forever (Ooh I hate that word :). The code will print the complex number A in the form (real_part_of_A, imag_part_of_A ) --------------- Peter Berdeklis Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |