Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/08/19/18:38:55

From: jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk DOT removeme (Jason Barstow)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Function Sizes
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 17:36:30 GMT
Message-ID: <>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970819161648 DOT 21250R-100000 AT is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: "Cable Internet (post doesn't reflect views of Cable Internet)"
Lines: 21
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

"Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>" wrote:

>The only reliable way is to write the function in assembly.

I appreciate you are trying to discourage bad practise but
will you please summarise the *current* situation
(RE: Using an "empty" function to determine function end)

Do any current optimisations break this method?

What about PGCC releases (Andrew?)


Jason Barstow (jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk DOT removeme)
Do you want to hire a villa in Florida? Not commercial!

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019