delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/08/17/17:38:43

From: mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: A Very New Beginner
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 22:57:19 GMT
Organization: [posted via] Easynet Group PLC
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <33f4dace.29862291@news.easynet.co.uk>
References: <n1L2USAWf93zEw77 AT jenkinsdavid DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <199708031806 DOT OAA11146 AT delorie DOT com> <cK4IrOAjjS5zEw+S AT jenkinsdavid DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <33e78095 DOT 11731866 AT news DOT cis DOT yale DOT edu> <33F42064 DOT 7CF3 AT mail DOT nbs DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: foot.easynet.co.uk
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Fri, 15 Aug 1997 10:24:52 +0100, John Lawrence
<jlaw AT mail DOT nbs DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:

>It might be useful if the FAQ could be split into 2 or 3 documents.
>I remember when I got djgpp up and running it took a while to work out
>which bits of the FAQ I actually needed to know..
>Maybe (i) an 'Installing FAQ' telling us which files we need, where they
>go,
>how to change AUTOEXEC etc...
>   (ii) a 'Compiler FAQ' - how it works, which command line options I
>need,etc
>   (iii) an 'Advanced FAQ' - Allegro/Graphics/Other programming stuff.

I personally think that is a very good idea -- provided it is made
clear what each deals with, and which are compulsory downloads (if not
all three). Otherwise you run the risk of having people ask questions
here that are answered in the FAQs simply because they read the wrong
FAQ, or didn't have the right one downloaded.

-- 
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019