From:	Myke AT cyberdude DOT com (Ricardo Cunha)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Vesa 2.0 is slower than 1.2 on my video card !!!!!
Date:	Sun, 27 Jul 1997 17:32:51 GMT
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<33db759d.717585@news1.telepac.pt>
References:	<199707221500 DOT IAA26318 AT adit DOT ap DOT net> <h9b6bEAOrn1zEwLf AT netbook DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <33d79d82 DOT 403618 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <xmerm05 DOT 3 DOT 33D8702E AT vse DOT cz> <33d8d7a0 DOT 2209688 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <q07JZBAD6R2zEwTj AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <33da53b7 DOT 2937881 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <n78bqBAfsx2zEwSk AT netbook DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ep1-p11.telepac.pt
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Dasse...

Maybe it's my fault, i'm not so good at english :)

It's better to start from the begin.

Someone tould us that is vesa 2.0 (using linear memory) was slower
that it Vesa 1.2
So, i think that maybe, maybe the emulator that he was running didn't
support directly is board. In that cases if the emulator (Vesa 2.0)
detects Vesa 1.2 it redirects Vesa 2.0 calls to board by using Vesa
1.2 calls. This process it's much slower than using Vesa 1.2 calls
because he must "convert" Vesa 2.0 to Vesa 1.2
I don't know the details of the process i only know how this can be
done.

----------------------------------------------
Ricardo Cunha
myke AT cyberdude DOT com
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/7471
ICQ: 2217830
----------------------------------------------

- Raw text -