From:	p DOT steiner AT t-online DOT de (Peter Steiner)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: A quick RHIDE question.... (fwd)
Date:	16 Jul 1997 21:29:35 GMT
Organization:	Telekom Online Internet Gateway
Lines:	87
Message-ID:	<5qjefv$r6i$1@news02.btx.dtag.de>
References:	<Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 95q DOT 970711113336 DOT 20748A-100000 AT newton DOT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de> <3 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19970713172245 DOT 00de9400 AT modempool DOT com> <5qg9rn$96m$1 AT news00 DOT btx DOT dtag DOT de> <33CCB673 DOT 6A1924B0 AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE>
Reply-To:	p DOT steiner AT t-online DOT de
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Wed, 16 Jul 1997 13:54:27 +0200, Robert Hoehne 
<Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE> wrote:
>Peter Steiner wrote:
>> Ok, I try it:
>> 
>> Can you do something like īmake <target>ī and īmake <another_tartet>ī?
>
>NO. RHIDE is NOT a make replacement.

Exactly. I thought that was what the original poster was asking.

>> It seems to be difficult to get the assembly output of the compiler. I have
>Very easy. Go to the menu 'Options/Compiler/Debugging options' and mark
>there the -save-temps flags which tells gcc not to delete the temporal
>files.
>
>When copiling for instance a file foo.c you will get (in addtion to
>foo.o)
>also the files foo.i (the output from the preprocessor) and foo.s
>(the assembler output).

Great. 

>> Itīs really difficult to find examples because RHIDE is so great!
>
>That's a logic, which I cannot understand.

Okokokokok.......

To anyone here who is still interested:

Please remember the origin of this thread. It started when Robert forwarded a
question he didnīt understand. 

Robert Hoehne wrote:
> Here a forward mail,
> because I don't know, what he means with the question.

The question was:
> Does RHIDE limit DJGPP in anyway?

This resulted in a discussion about the point of this question. 

Smith A. Cat wrote:
> well, richard, does 4DOS limit DOS in any way?
> does linux limit the PC in any way?

This didnīt seem to be an answer to the question. So Brian Mann tried to
explain what he thought the question could mean.
> I think (uh-oh) what they were asking is, if there are any options to GCC
> that you cannot use through RHIDE and would have to use the command line.
> But I've been wrong before.(understatement of the year)

I read this question sat down thought about the problem and wrote down two
possible answers:
> Can you do something like īmake <target>ī and īmake <another_tartet>ī?

Robert Hoehne wrote:
>NO. RHIDE is NOT a make replacement.

(One point for me ;-)   )

The second trial of me
> It seems to be difficult to get the assembly output of the compiler.

was easily defeated by Robert
> Very easy. Go to the menu 'Options/Compiler/Debugging options' and mark
> there the -save-temps flags which tells gcc not to delete the temporal
> files.

Tired fom hard working on answering the question I exited:
> Itīs really difficult to find examples because RHIDE is so great!

Robert must have forgotten the start of this thread:
> That's a logic, which I cannot understand.

And all because of:  īA quick RHIDE question....ī

I think this thread should come to an end.
Maybe the answer is just 42 (or slightly below). 

Peter Steiner
-- 
   _   x    ___
  / \_/_\_ /,--'  p DOT steiner AT t-online DOT de (Peter Steiner)
  \/>'~~~~//
    \_____/   signature V0.2 alpha

- Raw text -