Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/06/02/02:35:37
On 1 Jun 1997, Smith A. Cat wrote:
> I guess this is really a question for Eli, but maybe has some general
> interest: (and since i goofed on sed 2.XX!)
> is there a reason NOT to use the 2.3 release of PDCURSES??
I have nothing to do with PDCurses; I didn't even use it in DJGPP.
I think somebody have said here that a preliminary version exists.
You might consider searching the DJGPP mail archives
- Raw text -