delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/06/01/07:55:17

From: Tom Burgess <Tom_Burgess AT bc DOT sympatico DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Need help: NASM && DJGPP
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 00:09:54 -0700
Organization: BCTEL Advanced Communications
Message-ID: <33912042.5DBA@bc.sympatico.ca>
References: <338CCC25 DOT 5286 AT frankfurt DOT netsurf DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pntn02m02-119.bctel.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Lines: 18
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Torben.Jabben wrote:
> 
> Looking for a way not to program in this ugly AT&T assembler language. I
> found the free nasm Assembler, which allows me to program in well kown
> Intel syntax.
> But I have no Idea how to tell the Assembler and DJGPP to that I want to
> write classes containing Assembler functions.
> 

You could take a look at:

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~mmastrac/djgppasm.doc

Actually, I don't mind the AT&T syntax so much as the limitations of
the GNU assembler which was never really intended for direct usage. (Or
so it would appear).

	regards, tom

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019