Message-ID:	<c=US%a=_%p=Hassler_Communic%l=DAISY-970601013014Z-334@daisy.hcst.com>
From:	Bryan Murphy <bryan DOT murphy AT hcst DOT com>
To:	"'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Interpreted languages.
Date:	Sat, 31 May 1997 21:30:14 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0

God, I'm sick of beating this dead horse already, but Assembly 
is compiled to byte code.  Byte code is interpreted by the 
processor, so in a sense byte code is interpreted and EVERYTHING
is interpreted.  However, there is still a big difference between
a piece of hardware soldered together to do instruction A, 
Instruction B, etc. and a piece of software with its own innate
built in logic.  

Anyways, I'm done with this thread.  I can't take this anymore, I
need to argue about something else already! :)

>----------
>From: 	Adam W Lee[SMTP:adalee AT sendit DOT sendit DOT nodak DOT edu]
>Sent: 	Saturday, May 31, 1997 3:13 PM
>To: 	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
>Subject: 	Interpreted languages.
>
>Well, then, Pentium Pro assembly is an interpreted language.
>
>atomly
>

- Raw text -