Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/05/29/09:55:16
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Fred Smith wrote:
> GCC thinks the old stuff is a serious syntax error. However, on Linux I
> can just set the define the appropriate way so as to hide the gross
> stuff, and it compiles just fine. On DJGPP, given the same set of
> defines, GCC spews bazillions of error messages about syntax errors.
You don't really expect people to have useful ideas without even a clue
about the code, do you? As a minimum, please show a fragment of code that
gives you trouble, what is the magic define that solves the problems on
Linux, and a couple of examples of error messages. People who answer
questions on this news group aren't magicians: there is no intelligent
way to guess what are your problems without even seeing the error
message.
- Raw text -