From:	X-Bios <XBios AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	alt.lang.basic,comp.lang.basic.misc,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject:	Re: OmniBasic Announcement
Date:	Mon, 26 May 1997 22:56:11 -0600
Organization:	ReactiveWare Software Inc
Lines:	24
Message-ID:	<338A696B.42FC@hotmail.com>
References:	<3385F0D6 DOT 1DCE AT vax2 DOT rainis DOT net> <3387D4FD DOT 303D AT hotmail DOT com> <33889968 DOT 4148 AT vax2 DOT rainis DOT net> <338926E9 DOT 239A AT hotmail DOT com> <338ae78c DOT 2187765 AT news0 DOT xs4all DOT nl>
Reply-To:	XBios AT hotmail DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host:	provo-0128.vii.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Marc van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 26 May 1997 00:00:09 -0600, X-Bios <XBios AT hotmail DOT com> wrote:
> 
> >(a different section)
> >The MS-DOS version has some 500, the Windows version about 800, the OS/2
> >version roughly 1000, and the UNIX version about 900 commands and
> >functions.
> >
> >I think that's ample proof for GFA's OS/2 port.
> 
> I think that's it's also safe say that if HALF the commands between two
> versions are missing, it's poorly portable, at best.

True. Missing commands are non-portable commands. But as I said (in case
you
failed to read it) GFA tries to get the most from it's OS. There will
always
be LINE routines and such. Besides, how many BASICs can bost between 500
and
1,000 commands! Don't complain! QB doesn't even tough GFA's command
library!

-- X-Bios

- Raw text -