From:	Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: C++ front end bug
Date:	Wed, 14 May 1997 09:54:49 -0700
Organization:	Alcyone Systems
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<3379EE59.6C5EBA67@alcyone.com>
References:	<Pine DOT D-G DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970512113147 DOT 24572A-100000 AT dg1> <5l8qq3$gdd AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Paul Derbyshire wrote:

> Given
> 
> int aa[]={3,4,5}
> 
> aa is a pointer to int, type int *.
> &aa is a pointer to a pointer to ints type int ** or maybe to an array,
> int (*)[3], if the array is static.

Eh?  The & operator when applied to an array name is completely
superfluous.

-- 
       Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / max AT alcyone DOT com
                     Alcyone Systems /   web / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, California, United States /  icbm / 37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W
                                   \
                      "The future / is right there."
                                 / Bill Moyers

- Raw text -