From:	jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk (Jason Barstow)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: testing uclock()
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 1997 18:48:43 GMT
Organization:	Jabber Interactive
Reply-To:	jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk
References:	<1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 32 DOT 19970424124818 DOT 002d7ec8 AT ubeclu DOT unibe DOT ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	195.188.32.221
Message-ID:	<3360fc7f.0@ispc-news.cableinet.net>
Lines:	11
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Roger Noss <noss AT pupk DOT unibe DOT ch> wrote:
>Also, every third or fourth value is negative - why?
Yes,yes,
I've noticed this too.
Running in Win95 *and* DOS too (I think).
I was using uclock() to time the joysticks but the -ves
really screwed things up. In the end a wrote a "wrapper"
that ignored -ves. Of course I also timed it several times
and took an average.

- Raw text -