Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 1997 21:34:18 -0400
Message-Id:	<199704090134.VAA18282@delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in
CC:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.970408130754.5236A-100000@aditya.unigoa.ernet.in>
	(grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in)
Subject:	Re: A Suggestion.

> having said that, let me add that i did not express myself clearly the
> first time. what i meant was that wherever possible, why dont we include
> the texi files *in place of* the info files.

This would be worse, because the texi files are not usable as-is,
whereas the info files are usable by emacs, rhide, and info.  The
people who most need the documentation are the ones least likely to be
able to generate it from source.

- Raw text -