Sender:	mckee AT rtp DOT gtegsc DOT com
Message-ID:	<333A86BD.255E@rtp.gtegsc.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:39:57 -0500
From:	David McKee <david DOT mckee AT rtp DOT gtegsc DOT com>
Organization:	GTE (My views are my own)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Templates in the STL
References:	<199703262318 DOT SAA01194 AT delorie DOT com>

I have recently downloaded the STL to use as a foundation for 
my development.  I have not yet used it with DJGPP but I have 
seen other posts here that it works great.

I have one question concerning the syntax of templates.  I have 
attempted to compile on a Sun machine running SunOS 5.4 and 
the SPARCompiler version 4.0.1 using C/C++ SC3.0.1 (that may
mean nothing to most of you and thats okay...)

For the following template syntax in the STL include file 
"function.h":

.
.
.
template <class Result, class Argument = Result>
struct constant_unary_fun : public unary_function<Argument, Result> {
  result_type val;
  constant_unary_fun(const result_type& v) : val(v) {}
  const result_type& operator()(const argument_type&) const { return
val; }
};
.
.
.

I get errors for the '=' as the compiler syas it is expecting a ','
or another class, etc.  My question is: Is the = sign in templates
a new and widely unsupported feature of templates?  If so, does djgpp
and gcc handle them correctly?  Is there work arounds for this as I 
am just learning the intracies of templates. 

Thanks in advance!


-- David T. McKee: 
-- Think: Innovative Science Learning Systems
--                 Physics, Electrical Science, Computer
--                 Science, Natural Science, Theology
======================Signature Block====================
It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; To search out
a matter is the glory of kings.  Pr 25:2
---------------------------------------------------------
There is nothing so sacred as it cannot be looked into...
=========================================================

- Raw text -