Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/16/08:08:14
On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Moses wrote:
> I was hoping that I would NOT have to write this but:
>
> I am having marjor problems getting into the AT&T "groove" for writing
> asm. When I used TCC all I had to do if I waned to put this into ax
> was:
>
> mov ax, this
>
> But I just cant seem to get it to be that simple in AT&T ( or djgpp,
> Im not sure which is making it more difficult ). What I really want
> to do is
Did you consider using NASM? It supports the Intel syntax; see the DJGPP
FAQ for pointers to where to get NASM.
- Raw text -