Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/12/06:49:34
On 12 Mar 1997, G.P. Tootell wrote:
> erk!! this isn't in the clib references, nor the faq methinks. or is it hiding
> under some other heading maybe. i was under the impression this was the virtual
> only and didn't include the physical memory.
I think that it is only natural that virtual memory is all the memory
while physical is just part of it.
> having said that, i should still
> have 120meg however, so it doesn't actually explain why the malloc failed ;(
Well, your program works for me on a 16MB machine under Windows 3.11. So
you will have to debug while it doesn't work for you.
- Raw text -