delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/11/18:27:17

From: leathm AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au (Leath Muller)
Message-Id: <199703112309.JAA27312@solwarra.gbrmpa.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Interesting benchmark results
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:09:52 +1000 (EST)
Cc: demmer AT LSTM DOT Ruhr-UNI-Bochum DOT De, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970311231818.2704D-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Mar 11, 97 11:18:49 pm

> > It might be 67 MhZ/601 Processor.
 
> Then it is not so surprising that a 100MHz (or was it 133MHz?) Pentium
> delivers approximately the same performance.
 
Ummm, have you actually _used_ a 601? I have a Mac here using a 601 at
120 Mhz, and it performs about the same speed as a Pentium 20-30... :)
The 604's are more comparable for performance to a Pentium, with a 133
Mhz601 ~= P166...

Leathal.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019