From:	Paul Shirley <Paul AT foobar DOT co DOT uk DOT chocolat>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: c.o.m.djgpp retro-moderated?
Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 1997 21:02:14 +0000
Organization:	wot? me?
Lines:	21
Distribution:	world
Message-ID:	<VvMQINAW9dHzEw84@foobar.co.uk>
References:	<199703022040 DOT PAA22429 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	Paul Shirley <junk AT defeating DOT email DOT address>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	chocolat.foobar.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <199703022040 DOT PAA22429 AT delorie DOT com>, DJ Delorie
<dj AT delorie DOT com> writes
>As for the usual censorship argument, let me remind you all that
>moderation and retro-moderation don't stop posts, they only stop posts
>in the wrong groups.

The only choice needed really is wether crossposts are automatically
deleted or do they need examining first.
Of course I could be being a little extreme here ;)

Back in the real world: I suppose its worth discussing what an
appropriate response to the FAQs that annoy Eli so much should be.
Converting them to an email response *most* of the time sounds
reasonable to me.

Last time retro moderation was discussed on a group I read it was still
a brand new idea. Are there any sources of information on groups already
using it?

---
Paul Shirley: shuffle chocolat before foobar for my real email address

- Raw text -