Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/03/05/18:54:28
>> best interest of the group to understand the issues involved. If the
>> concensus is that R-M is the Right Thing I will accept that as the will of
>> the community. But I want to feel confident that it was an informed
>> choice.
>
> No, I'm not sure there is such a consensus. In fact, I personally am not
> convinced that it is the Right Thing to do. So your contribution to the
> discussion is welcome.
for what it's worth i agree with eli. partly because i don't see it's
necessary and partly because i don't see who would do the work. it would
have to be someone who was known and respected by everyone in the group
really. off the top of my head i can think of eli, dj, robert and shawn.
no offence to anyone else but i don't really feel anyone else has earnt the
respect of the community as a whole as much as these 4 people. and eli has
already said no to it.
>> example, if an off-topic question is posed it should not be answered in
>> the newsgroup. If someone wants to be helpful they should reply by email.
>
> Experience shows that this doesn't work, not because of malice but perhaps
> because that is how many DJGPP users behave. The only practical way to
actually this is the only newsgroup where people post and email the replies
to me (provided they remember to add the m :)
> make the noise lower is to have designated people on the news group who
> would point out such cases and ask the involved to kindly take their
> discission off the group. This requires that the majority of the
> participants will accept such judgement and abide by it. Personally, I
i think rather than one (or even a select few) making such decisions, it
merely requires any person to make such a request and for it to be reasonable
and i think the people who post here are mature enough to respect that person's
wishes. if a certain topic is getting out of hand and annoying people, those
people will say, hey guys calm down now, and it happens. the only time we
have problems is with crossposting to other groups, who aren't so polite.
> would hesitate to become such an arbiter, even if I were asked (and had
> the time), since I am not sure how well my opinions match those of others.
indeed this goes for anyone of course, deciding what is and what isn't
appropriate isn't always a clear cut case after all.
>> factors. My opposition to R-M should not be interpreted as a lack of
>> trust. I simply don't believe it is necessary.
>
> I'm not sure it's necessary either.
neither am i.
regards,
nik
--
Graham Tootell
nikki AT gameboutique DOT com
- Raw text -