From:	afn03257 AT freenet2 DOT afn DOT org (Daniel P Hudson)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: GCC Bug - Information
Date:	5 Feb 1997 08:13:40 GMT
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<5d9ffk$r29@huron.eel.ufl.edu>
References:	<5d3co5$o7p AT huron DOT eel DOT ufl DOT edu>
	<32f7a61a DOT 13502432 AT seashell DOT california DOT com>
Reply-To:	afn03257 AT afn DOT org"Dan"
NNTP-Posting-Host:	freenet2.afn.org
NNTP-Posting-User:	afn03257
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

billlanam AT california DOT com (Bill Lanam) wrote:
>On 3 Feb 1997 00:50:13 GMT, afn03257 AT freenet2 DOT afn DOT org (Daniel P Hudson)
wrote:

>No it is an extremely useful feature, for example lets say you change 

I'm sorry, and I'm leaving this group. Mr DS's misinterpretation of my
statements and utter lack of a real point was bad enough. Coupled
with his childish retaliation about reading and not doing when I stated
I did both, put me on the edge. Now you want to tell me a DOCUMENTED BUG
is NOT a BUG but a rather a feature? No wonder, DS took my statement
about Bugs offensively. You prefer to make a useful excause for them and
call them features. If I ever make such a statement again, I will be
sure to say, GCC w/DJGPP has as many features as Borland does Bugs.
Well that's enough of this fantacism for me. DJGPP will stay on my
HD, but I'll be reading gnu.gcc.bug where bugs are indeed considered
bugs.

Good day.

- Raw text -