Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/02/01/04:50:18
> Linux is obviously not for me. Maybe I'll try FreeBSD, or the Que
> Linux CD-ROM one day. Que book+products always seem to work well
> for me. However, I'm not going to claim Linux is an absolute piece
> of junk. Now, are you going to claim Borland's is because you
> couldn't get it working right? Only if your 3 years old maybe.
Well, sorry to break it to ya, but other than maybe Symantec, Borland's
C/C++ products are about the worst. Their glory days of TurboC 3.1 are
over man . . .
> >What planet are you from?
>
> You might want to answer this one yourself after your two false
> assumptions there, Mac. I have patched commercial software using debug
> before, it is POSSIBLE! In fact, I patched EDIT using ASCII coding
> techniques for machine code in EDIT. It is utterly amazing what one
> do when one is determined. Granted I would have preferred HLL src code
> to patch, I got the task accomplished just the same.
What exactly did you patch? Sounds kinda funny to me
--
Rob Vasquez
Digital Fx '97
email: digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
- Raw text -