Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 1997 18:41:46 +0000 ( )
From:	Gurunandan R Bhat <grbhat AT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in>
To:	Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: nasm or ta2as
In-Reply-To:	<32F14FCA.6704@cam.org>
Message-Id:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.970131184002.5531B-100000@aditya.unigoa.ernet.in>
Mime-Version:	1.0

i just downloaded the nasm093 version. there is a makefile for djgpp and it 
can be built "out of the box". and there is a cofftest for lnking with 
djgpp produced code. it works!!


gurunandan bhat 



On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Tudor wrote:

> David May wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > > unfortunately, nasm appears
> > > to no longer be maintained (looks like the project just died of death :( and ta2as works in part but throws up all number of errors. the biggest problem is that parts of
> > > the code are 486 and 586 specific and it complains 'not a 386 instruction' or something similar. it also throws up a whole buttload of errors at various points eg. LOCAL, .286, .MODEL LARGE and such
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > nik
> > I just got version 0.92 a few days ago; the changes file indicates
> > that the developer put out the new version in Jan, 1992.  Looks like
> > he is supporting it to me.  :-)
> Is this a joke I don't get?
> I have version 0.90 which was updated around october 96.
> -- 
> tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
> 'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'
> 

- Raw text -