Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/01/22/10:03:42
> Yeah, I'm anxious to get the sources too. I really like the sound of your
> plans! I think it would be too cool to have Linux long filenames in DOS.
> Both for read and write of course. Only new apps that are ext2fs aware
> would be allowed to use the fs routines though. Also, I think I'd like NO
> disk caching going on on those drives in case DOS locks up. Actually read
> caching is ok. I disable write caching in DOS all the time anyways.
>
> Well, TTYL
I'm _very_ much in favour of promoting bash (or whatever Unix-like
shell)
as the default shell and let the shell handle wild card matching. From
my earlier two FSD implementations, I know this _realy_ is a pain.
There are only about 4 or 6 bytes to maintain state for an FSD in
findfirst/
findnext calls. It definitely slows down the development of the FSD!
BTW, any information on OpenDos's stability?
>
--
Peter van Sebille
Origin / Nieuwegein BV
P.O. BOX 1444, 3430 BK Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
phone +31 (0)30 6088 888, fax +31 (0)30 6060 577
- Raw text -