Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 1997 05:28:24 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT sympatico DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT sympatico DOT ca>
To:	"K.A.R.L." <farega AT usc DOT es>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: 4Dos vs bash
In-Reply-To:	<32E4DF34.4D19@usc.es>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970122052535.141I-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Your mom.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 21 Jan 1997, K.A.R.L. wrote:

> I've been reading about bash in the news and in the faq, and I was
> wondering if it is worth the effort of moving from 4Dos to bash.
> 
> 	Can someone help me?

Why bother?  Use bash for script filing and makefiles and stuff like
that.  4DOS carries a much lower overhead AFAIK and has a lot of great
features as well to boot.  Since bash is a UNIX shell, a LOT of things
will be different.  I have bash for DOS, however I haven't really
played with it yet.  I know that I will use it though because I spend
about 90% of my time in Linux in bash.

Just my $0.02


Mike A. Harris - Computer Consultant http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris
My dynamic address:  http://www3.sympatico.ca/mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT sympatico DOT ca mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

URL of the day: http://www.digital.com

- Raw text -