From:	gpt20 AT thor DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk (G.P. Tootell)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: at&t opcodes -> intel opcodes
Date:	21 Jan 1997 09:55:39 GMT
Organization:	University of Cambridge, England
Lines:	13
Sender:	gpt20 AT hammer DOT thor DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk (G.P. Tootell)
Message-ID:	<5c23qr$9l4@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
References:	<5bvu1i$di AT lyra DOT csx DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <19970120 DOT 191505 DOT 4983 DOT 1 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	hammer.thor.cam.ac.uk
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

you're right. i'm going mad in my old age :) for some reason i have 3 references
here, each gives different cycle timings and the reference i was using didn't
seem to list all the floating point instructions for no obvious reason :(

nik

|> >
|> The opcodes are exactly the same.  The only difference is with AT&T, the
|> source is on the left and the dest on the right.
|> 
|> ..Chambers

-- 

- Raw text -