From:	"Martijn" <wkersber AT caiw DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is DJGPP just as good as Borland C++
Date:	21 Jan 1997 09:37:06 GMT
Organization:	CAI Westland/Kabelfoon
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<01bc077e$c9fb61e0$380bb2c2@pb>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970120201831 DOT 10551A-100000 AT bert DOT eecs DOT uic DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	194.178.11.56
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Or use djgpp with rsxntdj, which can produce win95/NT programs.

Andrew Deren <aderen AT eecs DOT uic DOT edu> wrote in article
<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970120201831 DOT 10551A-100000 AT bert DOT eecs DOT uic DOT edu>...
> Get Borland C++ 5.0 or VC++ (v?) or even Visual Basic.
> 
> On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Alan Wilson wrote:
> 
> > At 09:40 PM 1/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
> > >Alan Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks for the info.  I definitely want to learn to write large
programs
> > >> with graphics.  I can use DJGPP to write good graphical Win 95
programs
> > right?
> > >
> > >Sorry, but no.  DJGPP does not produce Windows 95 code.  The programs
> > >you write with DJGPP will run under Win95 since Win95 provides a DPMI
> > >environment (which DJGPP requires), but the resulting programs are
still
> > >DOS programs.
> > >
> > 
> > I see.  So what do I use if I wanted to write Win 95 programs?  If not
> > DJGPP, than what?
> > 
> > Alan Wilson
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

- Raw text -