From:	strider7 AT unm DOT edu
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Text editors
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:23:40 -0700
Organization:	University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<32DA99CC.29BE@unm.edu>
References:	<32D332BD DOT AAD AT dmv DOT com> <32d3c8d0 DOT 60903091 AT redwood DOT cs DOT sc DOT edu> <32D4884E DOT 3AD3 AT novia DOT net> <5b64bj$lbc AT whitbeck DOT ncl DOT ac DOT uk> <32D751E1 DOT 27 AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp-319.unm.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Elliott Oti wrote:
> 
> T.W. Seddon wrote:
> > Am I the only person who uses MS-DOS Edit?
> >
> > I think I've tried every editor on Simtel and quite a few more (maybe about
> > 100 or so!) and *not one* is as good as DOS Edit. (Although its replacement
> > of tabs by 4 spaces is very annoying.) If my choice offends anyone then tell
> > me a better editor and I'll use it!
> 
> To paraphrase Garth in Wayne's World:
> " A text editor is like a pair of new underwear: at first it's kind of
>   constrictive, but after a while it becomes a part of you".
> 
> Why I don't like Edit:
> * Only one file open at a time.
> * Can't run any external commands
> * No syntax highlighting
> * Really dumb file picker
> * Lacks basic grepping & find&replace abilities.
> * Is not configurable
> * Is a Microsoft product
> * Stupid message on startup so you have to hit 'esc' to clear it
>   (hate that in all editors)
> 
> But if Edit's the thing for you, use it by all means.
> (No, I'm not going to plug another editor)
> 
> Elliott

Can't remember about the older dos edit, but the one with win95 can have
up to 9 files open at a time, no stupid message, can find/replace, no
nifty colors or syntax highlighting, but its still good.  Ok flame away.

-- 
   http://www.unm.edu/~strider7
   <strider7 AT unm DOT edu>

- Raw text -