Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/12/04/01:35:58
Balial wrote:
>
> Borland couldn't write a stable _and_ easy to use program to save
> their lives. DJGPP is undoubtedly the best C/C++ compiler I have ever
> seen and or used and it is not complex. The only 'hard' part about it,
> for want of a better word, is the help that accompanies it (But that's
> not the compiler is it?). When I need assistance I usually look up my
> good ol' MS C6.0 function help, even though it it old and outdated it
> still has what I need and cross references. If DJGPP had this it would
> be _slightly_ better, but it is still the best.
I've asked other people and they haven't given me a good answer yet -
what's so hard about typing 'info libc alpha <function>' from the DOS
command line? Or just type 'info', TAB to libc.inf, TAB to alphabetical
list, and there you are. Or look by category. Or make a batch file
'djhelp.bat' with the line, "@info libc alpha %1". If you are already
using a command-line compiler, then you'd have to expect that the help
would be accessed in the same way.
There are two truly DJGPP-oriented editors/IDEs out there: RHIDE and
Emacs. RHIDE does indeed have context-sensitive help just like
Borland/Turbo C (in beta, admittedly). In Emacs, type C-h,i (Ctrl-h, i)
and navigate just like your standard info system. I am even thinking of
coding a lisp function to provide context sensitive help in Emacs. (If
such a function already exists, then please tell me so I'm not
reinventing the wheel. ;).
The point is, there are many alternatives available to DJGPP users who
want to read the documentation. I even heard that some of the docs have
been or are being converted to Windows Help files. It's out there; you
just have to look...
--
John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s+:- a-->? c++>$ U@>++$ p>+ L>++ E>+ W++ N++ o+ K? w(---) O-
M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP- t+(-) 5- X- R+ tv+() b+++ DI++ D++ G e(*)>++++
h!() !r !y+()
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Raw text -