delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Jeff Weeks <pweeks AT mercury DOT execulink DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Is djgpp better than Watcom C? |
Date: | Fri, 25 Oct 1996 17:33:52 -0400 |
Organization: | Code X software |
Lines: | 20 |
Message-ID: | <32713240.5DC2AC75@mercury.execulink.com> |
References: | <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961018104724 DOT 3677A-100000 AT aditya DOT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in> <1996Oct24 DOT 103643 DOT 5298 AT news> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ppp1.saturn.execulink.com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Gautier DOT deMontmollin AT Maths DOT UniNe DOT CH |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
> >> >Advantage djgpp: fastest-growing Dos compiler around. > >> >For the rest they're pretty much the same. > >> > >> Result: > >> DJGPP WATCOM > >> 1 : 0 > > DOOM was compiled with Watcom, QUAKE with DJGPP... And DJGPP programs are very easily ported to UNIX! A very big plus in my books! Results: DJGPP WATCOM 3 0 Looks like DJGPP wins :) Jeff
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |