Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/10/16/07:40:59
On Wed, 16 Oct 1996, Leath Muller wrote:
> Using near pointers, you never have to worry about that. And I have
> never written a program where the __djgpp_conventional_base changes...
> could someone explain to me a situation where it does? I have never
> encountered this when only running my application (I do just about
> everything under Win95 too... :)
It can only change when you call certain library functions, and even then
it depends on the DPMI provider. The FAQ has some more on this issue in
section 18.6.
- Raw text -