From:	Sengan DOT Short AT durham DOT ac DOT uk
Message-Id:	<16630.9607301045@ws-ai5.dur.ac.uk>
Subject:	Re: Printed libc docs
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 1996 11:45:36 +0100 (BST)
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960730130702.29599B-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jul 30, 96 01:15:44 pm
Mime-Version:	1.0

> > Hmm. I just figured out it seems to happen whenever there is
> > an underscore in the name, which happens pretty often ;-)
> 
> Do you know enough TeX to look at the TeX expansion and understand what it
> doesn't like there?  (I don't.)  If you cannot do that, try substituting
> `_' with `@_'.  Another possibility would be to try to run Texinfo and TeX

Yes, tex doesn't like _. In latex you \_ them, but in Tex, it's probably @_
I would expect the @code things to change to verbose mode, so there shouldn't
be too much trouble in them. It would be all the _ every were else.

Sengan

- Raw text -