Xref:	news2.mv.net alt.msdos.programmer:13740 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:6341 comp.os.msdos.programmer:26902
Newsgroups:	alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From:	alexad3 AT iconline DOT com (Alexander J Russell)
Subject:	Re: An key board handler ISR question.
Reply-To:	alexad3 AT iceonlie DOT com
Sender:	Newsposter AT iceonline DOT com (Newsposter)
Nntp-Posting-Host:	ns.iceonline.com
Organization:	ICE Online Internet news
Message-ID:	<Dv14ML.Ip6@iceonline.com>
References:	<4t2krp$8jp AT lion DOT cs DOT latrobe DOT edu DOT au> <838153889snz AT abcde DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 1996 04:03:57 GMT
Lines:	23
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <838153889snz AT abcde DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>, Dmills AT abcde DOT demon DOT co DOT uk says...
>
>
>It looks like you forgot to mask bit 7 before referencing the 
>table!!
>(Could be wrong).
>Dan mills
>-- 


Have you noticed that pressing keys on the "second keypad" generates more than 
one scan code? You get a 0xe0 followed by the usual scan code.

It probably isn't important, but I generaly just stuff the scan codes into a 
Queue and return from the ISR, and do all the processing after the fact.
Keeps the ISR small, fast, and simple, and I can make the scan code processor 
as fancy as I like.
-- 
The AnArChIsT! Anarchy! Not Chaos!
aka
Alex Russell
alexad3 AT iceonline DOT com

- Raw text -