Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4253
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rice!news!sandmann
From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Problems with findfirst/findnext in v2b4
Date:	Wed, 10 Jan 1996 08:34:34 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<30f3ce7a.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<4cvf65$krc AT news DOT manawatu DOT gen DOT nz>
Reply-To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> 	I am haveing some trouble with the findfirst and findnext functions in
> djgpp v2.0 beta4. The program of mine compiled under beta3 OK and gave
> correct results, but under beta4 the functions are returning junk.

Please tell us more about your configuration.  This is a new problem.

> They are returning false entries and many entries missing the first
> two letters of the name. Is this because of the new LFN support in
> these functions, and if so how do I turn it off? I am using DOS, not Win95.

LFN support should automatically be off unless there is LFN support 
detected on Int 21h, AH=71h.  In any case, you can turn off LFN support
with "SET LFN=N" at the command line (or autoexec.bat) or putting this 
symbol in the djgpp.env file.  But this actually sounds like you are
somehow using a V1.x library header which had the structure not be packed.

- Raw text -