Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4115
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!barney.gvi.net!news.netrail.net!imci2!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rice!news!sandmann
From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: v2.0beta4 problem
Date:	Thu, 04 Jan 1996 08:22:41 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<30ebe2b1.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<DKnL43 DOT EAJ AT jade DOT mv DOT net>
Reply-To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> OK, that works. But I can't understand why beta3 worked well
> without LFN set at all. I installed beta4 in the same way as beta3.

Well, it should work just fine, I'm not sure what the problem is.

> What if I want LFN? Do I need to install in a special way?

No, you should get LFN as default.  While I haven't installed b4 on
my W95 box yet, the prior intermediate release worked fine for me
and I don't think anything changed.  I'll try to check soon.

- Raw text -